raw / 16_intro_calls_(15_mins_=_4_hrs).md
Raw source · read-only
16_intro_calls_(15_mins_=_4_hrs).md
16_intro_calls_(15_mins_=_4_hrs).md
# 16 intro calls (15 mins = 4 hrs) 16 intro calls (15 mins = 4 hrs) 12 first rounds (12 hours) 5 onsite (20 hours) 2 offers 1 accepted 16 first rounds (4 hours Headlight technical screen 12 candidates (12*300 3600) 4 onsite (16 hours - 4 hrs saved) 2 offers 1 acceptance 4+ 12 + 20 = 36 hours 4+16 = 20 16 hours saved 16*300 = 4800 Cost = 2400 Hire 10 people a year 24,000 — Work with you Expanding the testing to different roles Set up different roles - talk to the hiring managers The 2 positions of the rubric - asking for feedback from hiring managers For data scientist Do a rubric for those down the road Practicing attorney, practicing 30 min phone with one of the hiring managers They we advance into 1 hour technical phone screen This is what we sub you guys in Then based on your feedback, decide onto an onsite, which has another technical screen We’re still working out — a couple of days - timing. If a candidate has a tricky schedule. Before 9am or after 6:30pm - that’s someone we send. If we have someone who Trent - who is in Texas - then another tech phone screen. Even if candidate has open schedule, if we can’t move fast, we work with you on that. We are refining - it gives a better feel with the candidate. Gives them the personal connection. With more competitive candidates - not always possible. Testing — https://jobs.lever.co/kiddom/fdaf1566-7e91-4a4d-bee6-d653345acd54 Data Scientist — JD What she would love to do - make a lever profile for us to publish directly into it. In her list. John Nguyen Data Scientist - https://jobs.lever.co/kiddom/0fc191cf-4b73-4765-b3e0-9b61f0d0bdfd
promote · cite · dialogue ⟶ coming in M3