raw / 16_intro_calls_(15_mins_=_4_hrs).md
Raw source · read-only

16_intro_calls_(15_mins_=_4_hrs).md

16_intro_calls_(15_mins_=_4_hrs).md
# 16 intro calls (15 mins = 4 hrs)

16 intro calls (15 mins = 4 hrs)
12 first rounds (12 hours)
5 onsite (20 hours)
2 offers
1 accepted

16 first rounds (4 hours
Headlight technical screen 12 candidates (12*300 3600)
4 onsite (16 hours - 4 hrs saved)
2 offers
1 acceptance

4+ 12 + 20 = 36 hours
4+16 = 20

16 hours saved

16*300 = 4800

Cost = 2400

Hire 10 people a year 24,000

— 

Work with you 

Expanding the testing to different roles
Set up different roles - talk to the hiring managers

The 2 positions of the rubric - asking for feedback from hiring managers

For data scientist
Do a rubric for those down the road

Practicing attorney, practicing

30 min phone with one of the hiring managers
They we advance into 1 hour technical phone screen
This is what we sub you guys in

Then based on your feedback, decide onto an onsite, which has another technical screen

We’re still working out — a couple of days - timing. If a candidate has a tricky schedule. Before 9am or after 6:30pm - that’s someone we send. If we have someone who Trent - who is in Texas - then another tech phone screen. Even if candidate has open schedule, if we can’t move fast, we work with you on that.

We are refining - it gives a better feel with the candidate. Gives them the personal connection. With more competitive candidates - not always possible.

Testing — https://jobs.lever.co/kiddom/fdaf1566-7e91-4a4d-bee6-d653345acd54

Data Scientist — JD

What she would love to do - make a lever profile for us to publish directly into it. In her list.

John Nguyen

Data Scientist - https://jobs.lever.co/kiddom/0fc191cf-4b73-4765-b3e0-9b61f0d0bdfd
promote · cite · dialogue ⟶ coming in M3