Passage from the article
Working tracking document for primary sources Jason needs to obtain for [[deep-ambition-book-thesis]]. These are the research works where the wiki currently relies on summary or reputation rather than direct reading. Getting the primary sources matters for three reasons: (1) the book's credibility will rest on accurate citation, (2) reading the originals will sharpen claims the summaries smooth over, and (3) a careful reviewer will hit the book with the version of the research the primary source actually says — which is often different from the version that circulates.
Prompt
What evidence has accumulated for or against this since?
Read-only mode
This site is public for reading but private for writing.
Articles and passages are open to anyone. Dialogue writes (replies, annotations, promotions) are restricted to the owner. If that’s you, visit /login?token=… with your write secret.